
The project has a model. It still does not have one truth.
Large Saudi projects are modelled in extraordinary detail and still run on spreadsheets and site photographs. QORA does not author models. It turns the ones a project already owns into a graph that carries schedule, cost, quality and evidence against every object.
- Sector
- Construction & Infrastructure
- Category
- Construction Lifecycle Management Platform
- Primary buyer
- Project director or head of project controls
- Entry wedge
- One project, one contractor, one discipline. Connect the model to the schedule and prove control before expanding across the portfolio.
Category and product architecture defined. Brand identity complete; product design still to be produced.
Stage 1 of 6: ConceptA model object that carries the whole project.
Move the phase slider, isolate a discipline, switch planned against actual, then open an object to see the schedule, cost and evidence behind it.
Loading product concept…
One object. Every fact about it, in one place.
QORA reads the design model a project already owns, then carries the schedule, cost, quality and evidence that normally scatter across six systems.
Product visuals in production
The model is not the truth. The site is.
A design model, a programme, a cost plan and thousands of site records that never reconcile. Progress is reported from memory and variance is discovered late.
- Model and reality diverge
- The 3D model describes intent; nothing continuously links it to what was actually built.
- Progress is narrated, not measured
- Planned versus actual depends on who is reporting and how optimistic they are.
- Evidence is scattered
- Inspections, snags and photographs live in phones, email and folders, not against the object.
- Handover is reconstructed
- Lifecycle data is assembled at the end instead of accumulating throughout.
The wedge
One project, one contractor, one discipline. Connect the model to the schedule and prove control before expanding across the portfolio.
What it is, and what is actually in the first release.
- Model ingestion
- IFC, RVT and Autodesk sources normalised into a project object schema.
- 3D web viewer
- Read-only browser viewing with discipline isolation and phase playback.
- 4D schedule mapping
- Schedule imports mapped to model objects for time-based progression.
- Progress & cost context
- Planned versus actual with cost carried against the object.
- Site quality & safety
- Issues, HSE and QA pins with photographic evidence.
- AI risk summaries
- Narrative risk and variance summaries generated from the project graph.
In the MVP
Model ingestion
IFC and RVT into a normalised object schema.
Read-only 3D viewer
Browser-based, no authoring.
Schedule import & 4D mapping
Activities mapped to model objects.
Site issues and evidence
Issue, HSE and QA pins bound to objects.
Planned versus actual
Progress computed from the graph.
Planned, not built
Phase playback & discipline isolationNext
Time and trade views of the model.
AI risk summariesRoadmap
Variance and risk narrated from project data.
Lifecycle and handover intelligenceRoadmap
Operating-phase asset data.
Scope boundary — QORA does not author BIM models. It consumes them. Authoring stays in the design tools a project already uses.
Who it is for.
- Primary buyer
- Project director or head of project controls
- Primary users
- Planners, QS, site engineers, HSE and QA teams
- Economic buyer
- Contractor, developer or asset owner delivering large capital projects
Built for Saudi delivery scale
Giga-projects, industrial plants, water and pipeline infrastructure, healthcare construction and large campuses — programmes where the cost of discovering variance late is measured in months, and where the contractor base is large enough to support a category.
The opportunity, with the arithmetic visible.
Published statistics and our own models are labelled differently, on purpose.
Saudi market signal
US$1.7T+
Saudi project pipeline reported in 2025
Reported Saudi project pipeline, 2025.
70,488
active Saudi Contractors Authority members in 2025
Saudi Contractors Authority, 2025.
Illustrative market model
1,500
initial target accounts
Contractors, developers and asset owners judged large enough to run project-controls software. Internal planning assumption.
SAR 375M
illustrative annual SAM
1,500 target accounts × modelled annual platform value. Illustrative, not measured category spend.
SAR 45M
illustrative five-year ARR at 150 customers
150 customers × modelled blended ACV. Management planning model.
The pipeline and contractor figures are published statistics. The account count, SAM and ARR figures are our own planning model and remain to be validated through customer discovery.
How it earns.
- Design-partner pilot
- One project, scoped deployment and measured outcome.
- SAR 60k – 120k
- Project SaaS
- Per active project, per month.
- SAR 10k – 25k / project / month
- Enterprise
- Portfolio-wide deployment with integrations and support.
- SAR 300k – 1.5M+ / year
Concept-stage commercial model. These are the price points the business is being designed around, not proven pricing and not an offer.
Economics — No unit economics are published for QORA. The company is at concept stage and any margin, CAC or retention figure would be invention.
The QORA project knowledge graph
The defensible asset is not the viewer. It is the normalised link between model objects, schedule, cost, evidence and outcomes across many Saudi projects — and the ontology that makes those links comparable from one project to the next.
- Normalised model-object schema across mixed design toolchains
- Connector library into scheduling, cost and site systems
- Saudi construction ontology and delivery conventions
- Project-outcome dataset accumulating across delivered work
- Workflow trust: the graph becomes the record teams argue from
Trust architecture
- Read-only model consumption — QORA never becomes the design authority
- Project and tenant isolation between contractors and owners
- Evidence carries author, timestamp and object reference
- Role-scoped access across owner, contractor and subcontractor
These describe how the product is designed. They are not certifications held.
Wedge first. Platform second.
- NowCategory validation with Saudi contractors and project-controls leaders
- NextMVP: model ingestion, 3D viewer, schedule mapping, site evidence
- ThenPlanned versus actual, cost context, phase playback
- LaterAI risk summaries and lifecycle handover intelligence
Independent company. Shared advantage.
QORA inherits the Yalla Digital foundation — product, engineering, AI and data, integrations, cloud, security and Saudi commercial strategy — rather than rebuilding it.
Sources & assumptions
- Saudi project pipeline
- Reported Saudi project pipeline above US$1.7 trillion, 2025.
- Contractor base
- 70,488 active Saudi Contractors Authority members, 2025.
- Commercial model
- Yalla Digital internal planning model, 2026. Not validated pricing.
Forward-looking figures are management targets and planning models for a pre-revenue company. They are not historical results, and no customer, revenue, pilot, partnership or certification is claimed anywhere on this site.